The uniform worn by schoolchildren has a brief and somewhat tangled time. Practically speaking uniforms for school in the present are rooted in an earlier British education system. To make things clearer it is important to note that the term “British public school” refers to a British private school can be comparable with the equivalent of an American private school, while the equivalent of an American state-run public school would be comparable to the equivalent of a British State school.
In the early part into the nineteenth century British schooling was the domain of a wealthy class as well as the mandarins from the latter part of the British Empire. But they were chaotic, with students acting in the manner they wanted to. The introduction of uniforms began to help instill an increased degree of cohesion and discipline and quickly gained acceptance in the system of public schools. It is remarkable that certain uniforms remain in a relatively uniform state.
As is the norm that the middle class – who had traditionally had their kids go to more exclusive, yet privately-funded schools began to adopt the look for uniforms at school that were used by their socially superiors. In 1870 the Education Act made schooling for everyone in Britain and many of the newly established state schools subsequently adopted the same uniforms policies that were widely adopted by private schools. system.From this point, until the 1960s, uniforms were almost uniform across Britain. United Kingdom.
The American experience offers an contrast. The uniform for school (except for Catholic and parochial school) was not widely known. A lot of schools had dress codes that were not prescriptive but rather exclusive. High heels and blue jeans are a good example. High heels, for instance, could be prohibited, but students weren’t told what to wear.
This is precisely the kind of method that our advocate for school uniforms claimed to have introduced in her school at South Houston in the late 1950’s. she attributes a significant improvement in grades and discipline.
In 1996 the year 1996, in 1996, President Clinton directed then Secretary of Education Richard W Riley to send the Manual on School Uniforms to all School Districts across the United States. The manual laid out the Government’s positionand created guidelines for schools across demon slayer uniform the country on which they could base the requirements for uniforms. The government’s view was that the use of uniforms in schools would decrease the amount of violence and indiscretion that schools experience however, they did not take the step of making uniforms compulsory, with the final decision being left to school districts.The views of the government was not accepted by the parents, students or school district administrators. In 1998, only 11 percent of Public Elementary Schools had adopted the uniform policy. However, in 2000, the figure was only up to 15.5%.The decision to introduce uniforms did not reflect the same view across the nation. Suburban schools had a less pronounced rate of adoption which could be due to an effort by a heavily polarized parent group.
The sides of the school debate seem to have firmly rooted and nearly polarized opinions There is an abundance of data and counter-statistics that can support either side of the argument.